When comparing vehicle tracking and protection systems, LoJack and Stargard often appear in the same conversation. Both are associated with theft deterrence, and both are offered through authorized dealers.
But they are not built with the same philosophy.
This article explains the practical differences between LoJack and Stargard, focusing on what matters most when a vehicle is actually stolen: Recovery.
The core difference starts with purpose
Before comparing features, it is important to understand intent.
Some systems are designed primarily to deter theft.
Others are designed to recover vehicles after theft occurs.
That distinction shapes everything that follows.
How LoJack approaches vehicle theft
LoJack is a stolen vehicle recovery system built around response speed. It uses advanced encrypted GPS technology and is controlled through a smartphone app.
When a theft occurs, the owner reports it immediately by tapping a red button in the app. That action generates a real-time tracking link that can be shared with law enforcement to support recovery efforts.
The system is designed to minimize delay and friction at the exact moment recovery matters most.
As a result:
- Average recovery time is 26 minutes
- Recovery rate exceeds 98 percent
- There are no monthly fees
- Installation is completed by certified professionals in under one hour
How Stargard approaches vehicle theft
Stargard has traditionally positioned itself as a theft deterrent system. Its focus has been on discouraging theft through visible warnings, immobilization features, and alerts.
Deterrence can be effective in some situations. However, once a vehicle is successfully stolen, deterrent systems offer limited recovery capability.
In scenarios where a vehicle is already gone, deterrence is no longer the primary concern. Recovery is.
Tracking vs recovery in real-world theft
A key difference between the two systems is what happens after theft is confirmed.
Tracking-focused or deterrent-focused systems may:
- Alert the owner
- Attempt to prevent operation
- Provide limited information
Recovery-focused systems prioritize:
- Immediate reporting
- Continuous encrypted GPS tracking
- Real-time coordination during recovery
In real-world theft cases, speed and coordination consistently outperform deterrence alone.
Cost structure and ownership model
Another important distinction is how the systems are paid for and maintained.
LoJack operates with a one-time payment and no monthly fees, aligning cost with long-term protection rather than ongoing monitoring.
Stargard’s pricing and availability vary by dealer and vehicle type, and its value proposition is more closely tied to prevention than recovery outcomes.
For many drivers, especially those in high-theft regions, recovery capability becomes the deciding factor.
Which system makes more sense for U.S. drivers?
The answer depends on what problem you are trying to solve.
If your primary goal is theft deterrence, visible systems may offer peace of mind.
If your concern is what happens when deterrence fails and a vehicle is stolen, recovery-focused protection is the more practical solution.
In the U.S., where vehicle theft is often fast and organized, systems designed for recovery tend to deliver more consistent outcomes.
The bottom line
LoJack and Stargard address vehicle theft from different angles.
One focuses on discouraging theft. The other focuses on recovering vehicles after theft occurs.
Understanding that difference before choosing a system allows drivers to align protection with real-world risk.
VG Motors is an authorized LoJack dealer in the United States, specializing in vehicle protection and stolen vehicle recovery nationwide.
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.